CWRU PAT Coffee Agenda

Tuesdays 10:30 - 11:30 | Fridays 11:30 - 12:30

+2 Testing physical models for dipolar asymmetry with CMB polarization.

mro28 +1 jbm120 +1

+2 Life-hostile conditions in the early universe can increase the present-day odds of observing extragalactic life.

kxp265 +1 lxj154 +1

+2 PBH dark matter from axion inflation.

kxp265 +1 jbm120 +1

+2 No evidence for extensions to the standard cosmological model.

kxp265 +1 mro28 +1

+2 Gauge dependence of gravitational waves generated from scalar perturbations.

jbm120 +1 sxk1031 +1

+1 Can anisotropy in the galaxy distribution tell the bias?.

mro28 +1

+1 Baryonic Higgs at the LHC.

bump   pxf112 +1

+1 Evidence against a supervoid causing the CMB Cold Spot.

mro28 +1

Showing votes from 2017-04-11 11:30 to 2017-04-14 12:30 | Next meeting is Tuesday May 19th, 10:30 am.

users

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.CO

  • Testing physical models for dipolar asymmetry with CMB polarization.- [PDF] - [Article]

    D. Contreras, J. P. Zibin, D. Scott, A. J. Banday, K. M. Górski
     

    The cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies exhibit a large-scale dipolar power asymmetry. To determine whether this is due to a real, physical modulation or is simply a large statistical fluctuation requires the measurement of new modes. Here we forecast how well CMB polarization data from Planck and future experiments will be able to confirm or constrain physical models for modulation. Fitting several such models to the Planck temperature data allows us to provide predictions for polarization asymmetry. While for some models and parameters Planck polarization will decrease error bars on the modulation amplitude by only a small percentage, we show, importantly, that cosmic-variance-limited (and in some cases even Planck) polarization data can decrease the errors by considerably better than the expectation of $\sqrt 2$ based on simple $\ell$-space arguments. We project that if the primordial fluctuations are truly modulated (with parameters as indicated by Planck temperature data) then Planck will be able to make a 2$\sigma$ detection of the modulation model with 20-75% probability, increasing to 45-99% when cosmic-variance-limited polarization is considered. We stress that these results are quite model dependent. Cosmic variance in temperature is important: combining statistically isotropic polarization with temperature data will spuriously increase the significance of the temperature signal with 30% probability for Planck.

  • Can anisotropy in the galaxy distribution tell the bias?.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Biswajit Pandey
     

    We use information entropy to analyze the anisotropy in the mock galaxy catalogues from dark matter distribution and simulated biased galaxy distributions from $\Lambda$CDM N-body simulation. We show that one can recover the linear bias parameter of the simulated galaxy distributions by comparing the radial, polar and azimuthal anisotropies in the simulated galaxy distributions with that from the dark matter distribution. This method for determination of the linear bias requires only $O(N)$ operations as compared to $O(N^{2})$ or at least $O(N \log N)$ operations required for the methods based on the two-point correlation function and the power spectrum. We apply this method to determine the linear bias parameter for the galaxies in the 2MASS Redshift Survey (2MRS) and find that the 2MRS galaxies in the $K_{s}$ band have a linear bias of $\sim 1.3$.

astro-ph.HE

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.GA

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.IM

  • No papers in this section today!

gr-qc

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-th

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ex

  • No papers in this section today!

quant-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

other

  • No papers in this section today!