CWRU PAT Coffee Agenda

Tuesdays 10:30 - 11:30 | Fridays 11:30 - 12:30

+2 $H_0$ Tension: Response to Riess et al arXiv:1810.03526.

bump   lxj154 +1 mro28 +1

+1 A Deep Learning Approach to Galaxy Cluster X-ray Masses.

mro28 +1

+1 Testing isotropy in the Universe using photometric and spectroscopic data from the SDSS.

mro28 +1

Showing votes from 2018-10-16 11:30 to 2018-10-19 12:30 | Next meeting is Friday Apr 25th, 11:30 am.

users

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.CO

  • Testing isotropy in the Universe using photometric and spectroscopic data from the SDSS.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Suman Sarkar, Biswajit Pandey, Rishi Khatri
     

    We analyze two volume limited galaxy samples from the SDSS photometric and spectroscopic data to test the isotropy in the local Universe. We use information entropy to quantify the global anisotropy in the galaxy distribution at different length scales and find that the galaxy distribution is highly anisotropic on small scales. The observed anisotropy diminishes with increasing length scales and nearly plateaus out beyond a length scale of 200 Mpc/h in both the datasets. We compare these anisotropies with those predicted by the mock catalogues from the N-body simulations of the Lambda CDM model and find an excellent agreement with the observations. We find a small residual anisotropy on large scales which decays in a way that is consistent with the linear perturbation theory. The slopes of the observed anisotropy converge to the slopes predicted by the linear theory beyond a length scale of ~ 200 Mpc/h indicating a transition to isotropy. We separately compare the anisotropies observed across the different parts of the sky and find no evidence for a preferred direction in the galaxy distribution.

  • $H_0$ Tension: Response to Riess et al arXiv:1810.03526.- [PDF] - [Article]

    Tom Shanks, Lucy Hogarth, Nigel Metcalfe, Durham University, England)
     

    Riess et al (2018c) have claimed there exist seven problems in the analyses presented by Shanks et al (2018) where we argue that there is enough uncertainty in Cepheid distances and local peculiar velocity fields to explain the current tension in $H_0$. Here, we take each of the Riess et al (2018c) points in turn and suggest that either they do not apply or that the necessary caveats are already made by Shanks et al (2018). We conclude that the main point to be inferred from our analyses still stands which is that previous claims by Riess et al (2018b) that Gaia parallaxes confirm their Cepheid scale are, at best, premature in advance of further improvements in the Gaia astrometric solution.

astro-ph.HE

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.GA

  • No papers in this section today!

astro-ph.IM

  • No papers in this section today!

gr-qc

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-th

  • No papers in this section today!

hep-ex

  • No papers in this section today!

quant-ph

  • No papers in this section today!

other

  • No papers in this section today!