Danail Obreschkow, Pascal J. Elahi, Claudia del P. Lagos, Rhys J. J. Poulton, Aaron D. Ludlow

Linking the properties of galaxies to the assembly history of their dark matter haloes is a central aim of galaxy evolution theory. This paper introduces a dimensionless parameter $s\in[0,1]$, the "tree entropy", to parametrise the geometry of a halo's entire mass assembly hierarchy, building on a generalisation of Shannon's information entropy. By construction, the minimum entropy ($s=0$) corresponds to smoothly assembled haloes without any mergers. In contrast, the highest entropy ($s=1$) represents haloes grown purely by equal-mass binary mergers. Using simulated merger trees extracted from the cosmological $N$-body simulation SURFS, we compute the natural distribution of $s$, a skewed bell curve peaking near $s=0.3$ for first generation haloes. This distribution exhibits weak dependences on halo mass $M$ and redshift $z$, which can be reduced to a single dependence of $\langle s\rangle$ on the relative peak height $\delta_{\rm c}/\sigma(M,z)$ in the matter perturbation field. By exploring the correlations between $s$ and global galaxy properties generated by the SHARK semi-analytic model, we find that $s$ contains a significant amount of information on the morphology of galaxies $-$ in fact more information than the spin, concentration and assembly time of the halo. Therefore, the tree entropy provides an information-rich link between galaxies and their dark matter haloes.

S. Carlip

A recent preprint by Wang and Unruh [arXiv:1911.06110] contains a number of criticisms of my paper, "Hiding the cosmological constant" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 131302, arXiv:1809.08277]. While Wang and Unruh suggest an interesting alternative scenario and raise an important conceptual question, most of their criticisms are incorrect, in part because of misunderstandings about averaging and about the nature of the "foamy" spacetimes considered in my paper.

Mariangela Lisanti, Matthew Moschella, Nadav Joseph Outmezguine, Oren Slone

There are many well-known correlations between dark matter and baryons that exist on galactic scales. These correlations can essentially be encompassed by a simple scaling relation between observed and baryonic accelerations, historically known as the Mass Discrepancy Acceleration Relation (MDAR). The existence of such a relation has prompted many theories that attempt to explain the correlations by invoking additional fundamental forces on baryons. The standard lore has been that a theory that reduces to the MDAR on galaxy scales but behaves like cold dark matter (CDM) on larger scales provides an excellent fit to data, since CDM is desirable on scales of clusters and above. However, this statement should be revised in light of recent results showing that a fundamental force that reproduces the MDAR is challenged by Milky Way dynamics. In this study, we test this claim on the example of Superfluid Dark Matter. We find that a standard CDM model is strongly preferred over a static superfluid profile. This is due to the fact that the superfluid model over-predicts vertical accelerations, even while reproducing galactic rotation curves. Our results establish an important criterion that any dark matter model must satisfy within the Milky Way.

Lior Shamir

The spin pattern of a spiral galaxy is a matter of the perspective of the observer, and therefore galaxies with clockwise spin patterns are expected to be identical in their characteristics to galaxies with counterclockwise spin patterns. However, observations of a large number of galaxies show clear photometric differences between clockwise and counterclockwise spiral galaxies. In this study the magnitude difference between clockwise and counterclockwise spiral galaxies imaged by the space-based COSMOS survey is compared to galaxies imaged by the Earth-based SDSS and PanSTARRS around the same field. The comparison shows that the same asymmetry was identified by all three telescopes, providing strong evidence that the rotation direction of the galaxy affects its magnitude as measured from Earth. Analysis of a large number of galaxies from different parts of the sky shows that the differences between clockwise and counterclockwise galaxies are oriented around an axis such that the photometric asymmetry in one hemisphere is inverse to the photometric asymmetry in the opposite hemisphere. Due to the provocative nature of the observation, it is difficult to identify an immediate explanation. A possible explanation could be related to the large-scale structure of the universe, which leads to violation of the cosmological homogeneity assumption. Another possible explanation that does not require the violation of the cosmological principle is that the observation is driven by galaxy rotation. Due to relativistic beaming, such difference is indeed expected to be identified and peak at the galactic pole, but it is expected to be far smaller than the differences observed by all three telescopes. Therefore, if the asymmetry is driven by galaxy rotation, it corresponds to a much higher velocity than the actual measured rotational velocity of galaxies.